[120262] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Stange)
Mon Dec 14 15:58:44 2009
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:57:58 -0600
From: Kevin Stange <kevin@steadfast.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B261450.8070704@sorbs.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig0D30AC10330DF7528AF7A2D6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12/14/2009 04:32 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
<snip>
> I'm a robot writing you on behalf of the SORBS' admins. The reason
> you're getting this automated response, is our desire to provide you
> with consistent and fast responses. I'm prepared to correctly analyze
> most of the cases appearing in the DUHL queue.
<snip>
This last sentence seems to be my point of contention here. I am trying
to get a /18 removed from the DUHL and every time the robot tells me
some arbitrary ranges I did not mention explicitly are being tested
and/or not eligible for delisting. Since the ranges not eligible are
configured the same as those that are, I can't figure this out.
Replying to the robot resulted in no response for a month, so I ended up
submitting a ticket via the ISP contact form directly, with all the
information requested, but the first time, someone just pushed my
request back to the robot and it refused ranges again.
I understand you get a lot of traffic to your ticket system, but I have
to wonder whether a system which is so complex and large that it is near
impossible to support and keep maintained accurately is actually still
useful. I assume you love (to some degree) helping kill spammers, but
maybe you need to solicit (screened) volunteers to expand your staffing?
--=20
Kevin Stange
Chief Technology Officer
Steadfast Networks
http://steadfast.net
Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688 | Cell: 312-320-5867
--------------enig0D30AC10330DF7528AF7A2D6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAksmptsACgkQkd/BoeKjg0i6NACdG2m0oWMQcC8WSFwvYcFKxnr0
YcMAn2c2edsHfHMRqfmsagYRH66KInCR
=pd7H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig0D30AC10330DF7528AF7A2D6--
