[120205] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Pitcock)
Fri Dec 11 20:44:43 2009
From: William Pitcock <nenolod@systeminplace.net>
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091211233929.39504.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:43:24 -0600
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
> >ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
> >Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
> >involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
>
> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
I think it is kind of fail that RBL people do not have e-mail based
contact addresses. Snoozenet is unpleasant to deal with.
William
