[12017] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: perf #s for GRF vs 7500 Re: Anyone Deployed Ascend's GRF IP Switch?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Craig A. Huegen)
Wed Aug 27 00:10:59 1997

Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Craig A. Huegen" <c-huegen@quadrunner.com>
To: "joseph j. kim" <jokim@ipcom.com>
cc: Joe  Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970826185014.10646A-100000@server.ipcom.com>

On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, joseph j. kim wrote:

==>So, who's numbers should we believe or feel are more appropriate to real
==>world situations?
==>
==>> Comparing GateD to IOS becomes more of a religious preference than
==>> anything else.  I'm content knowing both, truth be told.
==>> 
==>> > maybe someone can post some performance numbers.

Tolly's report didn't use CEF/FIB switching, and used classical
(centralized) switching.  Ascend paid Tolly for the test anyway--the only
*true* test would be one from Data Communications or similar.

/cah


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post