[120119] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave CROCKER)
Thu Dec 10 10:44:45 2009
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:43:36 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912100927330.15778@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/10/2009 7:29 AM, Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:
> As previously noted in this thread, msullivan@sorbs did a fairly good
> job of documenting this in an RFC draft. I'd say its still the primary
> goto to point people at for how to do things the "right way".
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00
The time to pursue something like this in the IETF is when there is a
substantial industry consensus that it is the right approach and that the folks
supporting it will actually use it.
Are those of you who have participated in this thread willing to conform to the
model specified in this draft?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
