[120117] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ronald Cotoni)
Thu Dec 10 09:00:49 2009
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0912101318390.3461@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:59:58 -0500
From: Ronald Cotoni <setient@gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Chris Edwards wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Michael Holstein wrote:
>>
>> | Their initial email said :
>> |
>> | [snip]
>> | Trend Micro Notification: 137.148.0.0/16 added to DUL
>> | [snip]
>>
>> Oh dear. =A0I can see why many sites that once used MAPS now don't :-(
>
> It isn't just idiocy like this thread. They never expire entries from the
> RBL, even when IP address space changes hands. The most stupid thing is
> that they will not accept bug reports from their customers, insisting tha=
t
> they come from the sender (not recipient). WTF?!
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finch =A0<dot@dotat.at> =A0http://dotat.at/
> GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS=
.
> MODERATE OR GOOD.
>
>
Very true. At my old place of employment a DUHL listed an ip since
before my previous company existed. For some reason, when we obtained
it, they still listed it. Sounds like a bug in the DUHL bot to me.
Also the standard makes a lot of sense. You may be on Trend Micros
DUHL by following the rules on SORBS DUHL and vica versa. Makes life
a pain.
