[119979] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: news from Google
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry Linneweh)
Sat Dec 5 16:08:23 2009
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:07:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh@sbcglobal.net>
To: Chris Hills <chaz@chaz6.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <hfdmoo$pck$1@ger.gmane.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I think this article best articulates what is going on with Google DNS=0A=
=0Ahttp://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356703,00.asp=0A=0Amost people are=
not going to reconfigure their routers to use gdns =0Aas a secondary dns=
=0A=0A-henry=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Chris H=
ills <chaz@chaz6.com>=0ATo: nanog@nanog.org=0ASent: Sat, December 5, 2009 5=
:21:24 AM=0ASubject: Re: news from Google=0A=0AOn 04/12/09 19:25, Christoph=
er Morrow wrote:=0A> one note: OpenDNS is not the only 'competitor' here...=
.. just one of=0A> the better obviously known ones.=0A> =0A> ie:=0A> 4.2.2.2=
=A0 L(3)=0A> 198.6.1.1/2/3/4/5/122/142/146/195 ex-UU=0A> Neustar (can't rec=
all ips, sorry)=0A=0AI maintain a list here [1], many of which are reachabl=
e with IPv6.=0A=0A[1] http://www.chaz6.com/files/resolv.conf
