[119965] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: news from Google
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Dec 4 16:40:11 2009
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:37:22 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Martin Hannigan <martin@theicelandguy.com>
In-Reply-To: <d99aaed40912041234t54101a3g82c96c757c511001@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:34:10PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Christopher Morrow
> <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Richard Bennett <richard@bennett.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Google will be all sweetness and light until they've crushed OpenDNS,
> > > and when the competitor's out of the picture, they'll get down to the
> > > monetizing.
> >
> > one note: OpenDNS is not the only 'competitor' here.... just one of
> > the better obviously known ones.
> >
> > ie:
> > 4.2.2.2 L(3)
> > 198.6.1.1/2/3/4/5/122/142/146/195 ex-UU
> > Neustar (can't recall ips, sorry)
> >
> > -chris
> >
> >
>
>
> Why did Google put an infrastructure critical application into PA space?
>
>
whats PA space in this context? clearly 8.0.0.0/8 was allocated
prior to any current group-think about what PA might be.
--bill
