[119850] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T SMTP Admin contact?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Thu Dec 3 01:42:45 2009
In-Reply-To: <247D4FDA-3D4D-4A75-96EF-B3D59E63CA2F@hubris.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:11:49 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Chris Owen <owenc@hubris.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Chris Owen <owenc@hubris.net> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
>> Because SenderID and SPF have no anti-spam value, and almost no
>> anti-forgery value. =C2=A0Not that this stops a *lot* of people who've d=
runk
>> the kool-aid from trying to use them anyway,
>
> OK, I'll bite--How exactly do you go about forging email from my domain n=
ame if the host receiving it is checking SPF?
Dont let me stop you playing russian roulette with your users' email.
