[119824] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consumer Grade - IPV6 Enabled Router Firewalls.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Durand, Alain)
Wed Dec 2 19:28:54 2009
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:27:28 -0500
From: "Durand, Alain" <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
To: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>,
Matthew Dodd <mdodd@doddserver.com>
In-Reply-To: <366100670912021624p55d344d2ga6b7c438a4b632e2@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/2/09 7:24 PM, "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Matthew Dodd <mdodd@doddserver.com> wrote:
>
>> > I meant to say 6to4, sorry about that. Nothing special there.
>> >
>> > -Matt
>> >
>> >
> 4to6 would be a mighty nice feature on a CPE =)
===> If you are thinking about only giving a v6 address to a CPE and still
offering a v4 service, there is a technology for that, it is called
dual-stack lite. See
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-02.txt
- Alain.
