[119801] in North American Network Operators' Group

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post

Re: FTTH Active vs Passive

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Wed Dec 2 12:46:28 2009

From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:45:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4B167895.80702@brightok.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--nextPart1814359.hZqU1L0pFt
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Another issue - how far does the technology support open access/infrastruct=
ure=20
sharing/wholesaling? Not only are networks that get public funding likely t=
o=20
be expected to provide these, but there is evidence that they are important=
=20
financially.=20

Benoit Felten's presentation at eComm Europe suggested that the takerate an=
d=20
the presence of wholesale were the biggest sensitivities bearing on the pay=
 off=20
period for a FTTH deployment.

--nextPart1814359.hZqU1L0pFt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBLFqe00c69vkueJcQRArvuAJ0W6P/rQmf5wVsMo5+UXKirktfElwCfTqs5
bz7f3a+DinEDS0aAmJCUhYU=
=f9Jp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1814359.hZqU1L0pFt--

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post