[119791] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Dec 2 09:15:38 2009
To: Will Clayton <w.d.clayton@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:58:48 CST."
<69069bc20912012258q77a6c144g92fedd4e2ce00570@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:14:16 -0500
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1259763256_3300P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:58:48 CST, Will Clayton said:
> enable the masses to communicate and, at the same time, appease, for lack of
> a better word, those who would capitalize on the sheer lack of unified
> infrastructure.
The same way we appeased them the *last* time we gave them incentives to
deploy true high-capacity broadband, of course...
--==_Exmh_1259763256_3300P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLFnY4cC3lWbTT17ARAtZ6AJ9GORTWLkp6WYAr6tkFAYSEx2GNMACfbwh2
HRf8T/bA76x77GfW9fokUew=
=xy6t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1259763256_3300P--
