[119777] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Tue Dec 1 15:16:43 2009
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:12:29 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Paul Wall <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <620fd17c0912011133r13a993eer72e3da41e8e529f9@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:33:20PM -0500, Paul Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White <dwhite@olp.net> wrote:
> > All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the CO/Cabinet
> > is a good way to future proof your plant.
>
> I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber.
>
> Drive Slow,
> Paul Wall
nifty... my own fiber pair - and I'll run 32 lambdas on each...
(can I has kewl new rare-earth glass ... so I can run 100G per lambda? - plz?)
--bill
