[119698] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What DNS Is Not
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Nov 26 14:55:25 2009
To: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:25:49 CST."
<20091126182548.GB4965@dan.olp.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:54:01 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1259265241_4756P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:25:49 CST, Dan White said:
> That's a disagreement we'll have to have. Anytime this issue has been b=
rought
> up in a public setting (here, slashdot, etc.) has resulted in terrible =
press
> and even corrective action. In particular, Network Solutions' attempt t=
o
> at this at the .com level was corrected.
There's two types of in-flight editing of data by a provider:
1) The kind I've requested that they do.
2) The kind they're doing without my knowledge or consent.
The first should be monetized, the second needs a really bright flashligh=
t.
Why is this distinction so hard for people to comprehend?
--==_Exmh_1259265241_4756P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLDtzZcC3lWbTT17ARAva6AKDvKiwakgs7eSialSwk0LM4LLHV0wCguplo
LAgDvxf9B3gB+aelypLcAXI=
=DvxN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1259265241_4756P--
