[119656] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Who has AS 1712?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Wed Nov 25 09:58:30 2009
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20091125112942.0565e050@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:57:30 -0800
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
Cc: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:33 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 08:57 25/11/2009 +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>> shouting. This is all water under the bridge of course and we are
>> moving on;
>> I do not say everything is ideal now. However the RIRs are actively
>> working to publish a complete set of stats files which also includes
>> unallocated resources.
I would've thought IANA would be responsible for unallocated resources.
=20
>> This is the next best thing to full database
>> synchronisation. APNIC and the RIPE NCC are driving this effort.
>=20
> Perhaps the RIRs could get together and agree on a common whois syntax =
so that when I check one RIR with one syntax - it would work on others =
as well? =20
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4698.txt
More seriously, the theory is that the RIRs are bottom-up driven. If =
you think a unified whois schema across all RIRs (or even IRIS =
deployment) would be a good thing to have, there are likely better =
venues to raise the issue than NANOG.
Regards,
-drc
