[119654] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: I got a live one! - Spam source
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Russell Myba)
Wed Nov 25 09:41:47 2009
In-Reply-To: <6cd462c00911242317g5fa67dd4me2199661ca400791@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:40:55 -0500
From: Russell Myba <rusmyba@gmail.com>
To: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Michael Peddemors
> <michael@linuxmagic.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Depends on the activity, but this re-iterates the importance of
>> maintaining correct SWIP, so that only the offenders get listed, and not
>> bordering
>> customers.
>>
>
> Right. There are *so many* loopholes in this entire process, Bad Guys are
> waltzing through it.
>
> - - ferg
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
>
> wj8DBQFLDNofq1pz9mNUZTMRAgNrAKDz6JwFqBG3gvXEIKo1UVrJSTmxDQCfadqV
> Ph3qt/qPDze8Z5tsRP7LgSw=3D
> =3DgQrR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
> =A0Engineering Architecture for the Internet
> =A0fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
> =A0ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
>
>
Could you elaborate on what constitutes correct swip information?
