[119629] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Who has AS 1712?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Nov 25 02:15:01 2009
In-Reply-To: <D9B825ED-E302-4D10-B769-7AEF3EE3C040@hopcount.ca>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:14:13 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> It seems to me that at some point we need to stop trying to put dresses on the pig.
how, given where we are today, do you do that? I agree that presence
of an ASN in routing data (in as_paths really) isn't proof of
existence/use/abuse but not checking is not helping. 100% perfect
would be awesome, today we have less than 100%, we could be doing a
job closer to 100% by acting on some low-hanging fruit.
To really move forward and get to 100% (or as near as we can hope for)
what steps/actions/changes do you propose? It seems that at least
RIPE/ARIN have their attentioned aimed this way now :)
-Chris
