[119616] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: fight club :) richard bennett vs various nanogers, on paid peering

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Bennett)
Tue Nov 24 23:56:52 2009

Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:55:59 -0800
From: Richard Bennett <richard@bennett.com>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4b0cb711.wfivEH7u/aZcdwL0%ops.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Yes, it's a good old-fashioned Usenet-style flame-fest. Sort of.

It turns out you can say any damn thing you want about peering since 
nobody has any facts.

RB

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/how-video-is-changing-the-internet/
>
> Does the FTC's question 106 hurt paid peering or not?  88 comments.
> Makes real interesting reading, I must say.
>
> 	srs
>
>   

-- 
Richard Bennett
Research Fellow
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Washington, DC



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post