[119555] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Who has AS 1712?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Nov 23 23:33:56 2009
In-Reply-To: <m2pr78bwff.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:33:01 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> In all seriousness though, how does this get fixed? and... who has to
>> renumber? :)
>
> luckily, it's not a renumber in the ip address sense. =A0but some router
> jock[ette]s are gonna be even more overworked than usual.
hope for their sake it's just 1 router :) and 2 transits ... if they
have internal bgp setup (more than one router in their peering/transit
edge) it's going to cause them some pain :(
(at least with only 1 router and 2 bgp peers you could hope to static
route around the maintenance event)
> how to detect if there are more instances?
o Should some form of 'scrape routeviews before assignment' happen at
the RIR? (if you don't like o RV, pick another 2-3 sources of data)
o How do you make sure each RIR does this act?
o Should the customer check public data sources before acceptance?
o Is there a 30 day revoke/return dance for Number Resources?
> how to prevent new instances, both asn and ip?
See above ... It seems sensible to check existing data sources, if
that can be automated easily enough?
-chris
