[119433] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Varriale)
Wed Nov 18 19:02:16 2009
From: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale@comcast.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:01:11 -0600
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
As a side note that many may be aware of, there are other Cisco
products/code bases that have these nice features.
tv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Cosgrove" <paul.cosgrove.nanog@gmail.com>
To: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
> The design differences you describe there relate more to traditional IOS
> vs
> JUNOS, rather than IOS XR vs JUNOS. IOS XR uses candidate configurations,
> commit, rollback etc.
>
> Paul.
