[119364] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Stewart)
Mon Nov 16 15:17:47 2009
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:17:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <005401ca66f8$1281f5f0$3785e1d0$@net>
From: "Paul Stewart" <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net>
To: "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net>,
"Babak Pasdar" <bpasdar@batblue.com>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Yes, we use Arbor here and *really* like it... powerful system - not
cheap but worth every penny...;)
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 3:05 PM
To: 'Babak Pasdar'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Babak Pasdar [mailto:bpasdar@batblue.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 2:37 PM
>
> Could some of you share your recommendations on the best tools for
> monitoring per AS communications. I would like to track all source AS
> to Destination AS traffic utilization.
Depending on your price range, you might want to take a look at Arbor's
Peakflow SP. There is some pretty top notch traffic and routing
analysis
tools in their package.
Regards,
Stefan Fouant
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to=
which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material=
. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and =
then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying,=
distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
