[119354] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Mon Nov 16 12:05:36 2009
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:04:46 +0100
From: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>
To: net-ops@monolith-networks.net
In-Reply-To: <29152.82.132.136.147.1258388092.squirrel@webmail-vh.tagadab.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* Gary Mackenzie
> I had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering
> routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P and
> PE router roles but never as border routers.
We've been using the MX-es as border routers for some time now. It's a
role that suits them very well in my opinion, no problems at all so far.
I'll be very surprised if we don't end up using MX-es in our next PoP
as well.
Best regards,
--
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
