[119352] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sthaug@nethelp.no)
Mon Nov 16 11:38:19 2009
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:37:42 +0100 (CET)
To: net-ops@monolith-networks.net
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <29152.82.132.136.147.1258388092.squirrel@webmail-vh.tagadab.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering
> routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P and PE
> router roles but never as border routers.
We use MX series as peering routers. They work very well.
Steinar Haug, AS 2116
