[119350] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Fleming)
Mon Nov 16 11:15:31 2009
From: Brad Fleming <bdfleming@kanren.net>
To: net-ops@monolith-networks.net
In-Reply-To: <28807.82.132.136.147.1258386842.squirrel@webmail-vh.tagadab.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:14:34 -0600
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'd think the Juniper MX series might fit, as well as the Brocade
NetIron XMR. And of course the Cisco you already mentioned.
-brad
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote:
> Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering
> routers
> these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to
> Juniper M
> series routers?
>
> I'm asking as the prices to upgrade to 10Gbit capable Juniper units
> (ie.
> an M120) seem prohibitively high so I'm looking to get a feel for the
> alternatives. The other obvious platform would appear to be a Cisco XR
> 12404 (or similar depending on line card requirements) but is anything
> else in common use as a peering platform?
>
> Cheers for any input.
>
> Rgds
>
> Gary
>
>
>
