[119348] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Mon Nov 16 11:08:57 2009
In-Reply-To: <C4B155DD-3069-4159-9B44-327FBFBFB1ED@wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:08:27 -0700
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, net-ops@monolith-networks.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:04, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder@wisc.edu> wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote:
>
>> Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering routers
>> these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to Juniper M
>> series routers?
>
> have you looked at the MX series?
+1
~Chris
>
> Dale
>
>
--
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.coisoc.org
