[119314] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Loiacono)
Fri Nov 13 11:30:13 2009
In-Reply-To: <m21vk2zh0n.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon@csc.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:29:17 -0500
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>From a colleague here at NASA (high-performance computing area):
"We are currently using our three Arista switches as
an extremely economical way to get a 10G non-blocking
testbed for our various test areas. We have every
intention of looking at them as an option for
their routing capabilities, but have been buried
with setup and testing of our testbed equipment and
getting ready for Super Computing 2009. They seem
to have a number of very promising possibilities and
have so far proven to be very capable switches.
Paul Lang"
Joe
From:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To:
Matthew Walster <matthew@walster.org>
Cc:
nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date:
11/13/2009 08:34 AM
Subject:
Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
i have seen no mention of arista as a tos switch/router, yet folk tell
me it is one of the hottest on the block today. is there anyone who is
actuallly using it who would care to report?
randy
