[119310] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Walster)
Fri Nov 13 07:15:38 2009

In-Reply-To: <4AFC7917.5040002@davidcoulson.net>
From: Matthew Walster <matthew@walster.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:14:27 +0000
To: David Coulson <david@davidcoulson.net>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

2009/11/12 David Coulson <david@davidcoulson.net>

> You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even leverage
> something like VPLS - Not sure of any TOR-level switches that MPLS
> pseudowire a port into a VPLS cloud though.
>

Just to let you know - the Juniper EX4200 series only support a single label
stack, and RSVP not LDP - plus they have a restricted BGP table size, so
VPLS is out of the question.

Matthew Walster

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post