[119236] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Traffic Engineering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey Lyon)
Tue Nov 10 13:34:17 2009
In-Reply-To: <F3318834F1F89D46857972DD4B411D70017D1E99CE@EXCHANGE.thenap.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:33:34 -0500
From: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>
To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Isn't Route Science EOL?
Jeff
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com> wrote=
:
> Howdy,
>
> If you have several transit providers connected to your network and much =
of your traffic is generally directed by the "BGP tiebreaker" (i.e. lowest =
IP address) is there a way, without specifying on a per-prefix basis to pre=
fer the "tie breaker winner" slightly less often? I don't want to "complete=
ly flip" the preference so that it just saturates a different link, I am ju=
st trying to see if there is any good way to influence the "natural" select=
ion method.
>
> We have 6 transit providers, and Level3 always wins because it is 4/8, no=
rmally this isn't a problem because we have traffic engineering systems (ro=
ute science/avaya) which move traffic away from that link, but if we need t=
o reboot the RS, or something catastrophic happens we would like it to spre=
ad out a little more evenly.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> -Drew
>
>
>
--=20
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications of The IRC Company, Inc.
Platinum sponsor of HostingCon 2010. Come to Austin, TX on July 19 -
21 to find out how to "protect your booty."
