[118964] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: New Class C's just lit on on AT&T, Email Marketing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Peach)
Tue Nov 3 15:30:49 2009
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:29:54 -0500
From: John Peach <john-nanog@johnpeach.com>
In-reply-to: <20091103201043.GL9711@earth.coinet.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:10:43 -0800
"Aaron L. Meehan" <aaron@coinet.com> wrote:
> I don't think AT&T cares, since I complained about a massive snowshoe
> spamming campaign a couple of months ago--no action taken it
> seems--and they have netblocks all over the place there. A bunch of
> customers were calling me since their junk was being scored low by
> spamassassin and ending up in inboxes. Blah! I've seen spam from
> each one of their blocks at at&t.
>
> 99.155.208-209
> 99.51.80-81
> 99.170.198-199
> 99.16.32-39
>
>
99.16.32.0/21 REJECT
99.51.80.0/23 REJECT
99.155.208.0/23 REJECT
99.170.198.0/23 REJECT
will do nicely, thank-you.
--
John
