[118934] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bret Clark)
Tue Nov 3 07:19:01 2009
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:18:28 -0500
From: Bret Clark <bclark@spectraaccess.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <b4fbab630911030405n7334c00fk5bb6c03b7bc11317@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
True, we usually find Linux based machines work better running IPerf
then Windows (at least out of the box) because of the TCP window
size....well Windows XP at least, don't know about Vista or 7.
Jason Biel wrote:
Please take note with using iperf that you'll want to make sure the
appropriate TCP Window Size has been negotiated. We recently did some
testing with systems that had decided to pick less than optimal window sizes
and in turn had to manually set the size within iperf options.
Jason
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Benoit VANNIER [1]<benoit.vannier@apog.net>wrote
:
Hello,
Iperf is pretty good at this ... It s free
Ben
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Mark Urbach [[2]mailto:mark.urbach@pnpt.com]
Envoyé : lundi 2 novembre 2009 22:57
À : [3]nanog@nanog.org
Objet : Speed Testing and Throughput testing
Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when testing at
10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
Do you have a server/software that customer can test too?
Thanks,
Mark Urbach
PinPoint Communications, Inc.
100 N. 12th St Suite 500
Lincoln, NE 68508
402-438-6211 ext 1923 Office
402-660-7982 Cell
[4]mark.urbach@pnpt.com
[[5]cid:image003.jpg@01CA5BD5.1A5CEE20]
References
1. mailto:benoit.vannier@apog.net
2. mailto:mark.urbach@pnpt.com
3. mailto:nanog@nanog.org
4. mailto:mark.urbach@pnpt.com
5. cid:image003.jpg@01CA5BD5.1A5CEE20
