[118877] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Upstream BGP community support
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Nov 1 13:02:20 2009
To: Dorian Kim <dorian@blackrose.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:33:52 CDT."
<20091101003352.GB81416@blackrose.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:59:19 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1257098359_10149P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:33:52 CDT, Dorian Kim said:
> Fact is, regardless of whether you or I think it makes any sense or
> not is that some peering agreements preclude disclosure of the locations
> of peering, and in some extreme cases even the disclosure of the
> existance of said peering.
As Louis Mamakos pointed out back in 1992 or so, it's hard to conceal the
existence of said peering:
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~hansell/humor/wormholes
(Unfortunately, this is the only copy online I was able to find, and it's
missing the e-mail headers. The one I had has gone astray. Gene Spafford used
to have a copy online for a class, but it too appears to have evaporated.
Anybody got a pointer to the original?
--==_Exmh_1257098359_10149P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFK7cx3cC3lWbTT17ARAjenAJ9SRy1/Iq2T8TOQ2qNUhAIePAhxbQCfW8kf
WMTmSo8v8bugkMwIqJFgT4s=
=1guD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1257098359_10149P--
