[118782] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Wed Oct 28 19:52:37 2009
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
To: Walter Keen <walter.keen@rainierconnect.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AE8C6D6.4070309@rainierconnect.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:52:23 +1300
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Apologies if this message is brief, it is sent from my cellphone.
On 29/10/2009, at 11:33, Walter Keen <walter.keen@rainierconnect.net>
wrote:
> Most aDSL modems if set to PPPoE (I think Actiontec's come this
> way by
> default) will send the mac as the pppoe un/pw.
> David E. Smith wrote:
>
> Opinions on this? I'd be interested in hearing the latest real world
> experience for both and the direction most folks are going in.
>
> I can't speak to which would be better on copper specifically, but in
>
>
> general I'd favor DHCP over PPPoE. Either way, most of the back-end
> stuff
> will be similar (you'll need a way to authenticate users, turn them
> off and
> on, et cetera); the differences won't be all that big. Either you're
> storing
> their MACs in a database, or their port assignments and VLAN tags,
> or their
> usernames and passwords.
>
> With PPPoE, however, the end-user can't just plug in and go -
> they'll have
> to configure their PC, or a DSL modem, or something. That means a
> phone call
> to your tech support, most likely. In many cases, DHCP can lead to
> plug-and-play simplicity, which means they don't have to call you,
> and you
> don't have to answer their calls. Everyone wins. :)
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
>
> --
>
>
> Walter Keen
> Network Technician
> Rainier Connect
> (o) 360-832-4024
> (c) 253-302-0194
>
> !DSPAM:22,4ae8c6fe233691194411224!
>
>
