[118390] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 2009.10.21 NANOG47 day 3 notes

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Soucy)
Wed Oct 21 11:38:41 2009

Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:37:42 -0400
From: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Regarding: http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Wednesday/Hughes_Kosters_fundamentals_N47_Wed.pdf

Very common misconception for the "ipv6 enable" interface config
statement for IOS on slides 19, 21, etc.

The "ipv6 enable" statement is only necessary to enable IPv6 on an
interface if you are not assigning it an IPv6 address (e.g. this will
simply enable IPv6 with a LL address).  Otherwise it is useless.

Would be a good idea to stop spreading the false assumption that "ipv6
enable" determines whether or not IPv6 is active on an interface.

-- 

Ray Soucy
Communications Specialist

+1 (207) 561-3526

Communications and Network Services

University of Maine System
http://www.maine.edu/


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post