[118323] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cisco VSS-1440 migration query
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leland Vandervort)
Mon Oct 19 13:46:36 2009
From: Leland Vandervort <leland@taranta.discpro.org>
To: Jason Giles <jgiles@e-dialog.com>
In-Reply-To: <F666219FD7972B488B96751AD89464AE35D41893@tigger.ad.e-dialog.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:45:40 +0200
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: leland@taranta.discpro.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:06 -0400, Jason Giles wrote:
> >From my test, all physical interfaces configs on switch 2 are factory defaulted and SVI interfaces deleted on switch 2 upon running the conversion commands.
This one is alarming, especially given that there may well be some
physical interfaces that are only present/used on one of the two chassis
in the group. Would be interesting to see if they are defaulted to
factory or not. (I would expect unused ports to be defaulted, but not
ones actually configured and actively in use). Don't suppose you're
able to test that one?
However, this sounds like good news for the VLAN/virtual interfaces
though.
>
> Switch 1 is intact with the new naming convention as well as SVI's.
>
> I cannot comment on glbp as I do not run it.
The glbp isn't really that much of a worry since those are being
converted from HSRP anyway so will have to manually do those.
>
>
>
>
> /Jason
>
Thanks dude... sounds like it partially answers my question, but raises
another ;)
L.
