[118291] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Sun Oct 18 13:33:01 2009
From: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: "'NANOG'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <7a6830090910180926u1e04af9uf88c8ce308fef064@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:33:52 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I notice that Cisco has a "prefix no-autoconfig" statement in some
Yes, advertise it as on-link but not suitable for autoconfig.
You would want to do this (along with the M & O bits) for a stateful-DHCPv6
segment ...
> >From what I've been told, Cisco is actively working on RA-gaurd for
> their managed switching platforms, which will be nice to see.
And not just Cisco, IIRC it is an open standard anyone can implement ... ?
> The SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 war all seems a bit silly. They're both tools
> that are designed to compliment one another, and both have their uses.
++1
(And if I could vote "yes" on that statement more than once on that I would
...)
/TJ
