[118225] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Oct 14 11:47:49 2009
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:47:07 -0400
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <6B62AB1E-1620-4911-81CD-25CCF4287520@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> As for accusations, I challenge you to show where I accused them of
> anything.
> From: patrick@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:09:58 -0400
> Subject: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering
> In-Reply-To: <a05493650910120441i27550f17qaa7d3377824afdda@mail.gmail.com>
> References: <a05493650910120441i27550f17qaa7d3377824afdda@mail.gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <0A37FD5D-D9D1-4D89-AC8A-105612BB8E39@ianai.net>
>
> ...
>
> It is sad to see that networks which used to care about connectivity,
> peering, latency, etc., when they are small change their mind when
> they are "big". The most recent example is Cogent, an open peer who
> decided to turn down peers when they reached transit free status.
> I never thought HE would be one of those networks.
