[118203] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP customer assignments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Tue Oct 13 22:05:22 2009
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
In-Reply-To: <20091014011440.GC612455@hiwaay.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:04:24 +1300
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 14/10/2009, at 2:14 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> What about web-hosting type servers? Right now, I've got a group of
> servers in a common IPv4 subnet (maybe a /26), with a /24 or two
> routed
> to each server for hosted sites. What is the IPv6 equivalent? I can
> see a /64 for the common subnet, but what to route for aliased IPs for
> web hosts? It is kind of academic right now, since our hosting
> control
> panel software doesn't handle IPv6, but I certainly won't be putting
> 2^64 sites on a single server. Use a /112 here again as well? Use a
> /64 per server because I can?
Why route them to the servers? I would just put up a /64 for the web
servers and bind addresses to your ethernet interface out of that /64
as they are used by each site.
I guess you might want to route them to the servers to save ND entries
or something on your router?
--
Nathan Ward
