[118168] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 in the ARIN region
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Spears)
Tue Oct 13 13:57:47 2009
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:56:54 -0400
From: Chris Spears <cspears@eng.oar.net>
To: David Temkin <davet1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <148641da0910130909p4538c67bm28a40e226d6990a4@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: cspears@eng.oar.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
David Temkin wrote:
> I contacted 209 yesterday (due to the ongoing Cogent/174 silliness) and it
> seems like they are willing to turn up customer-facing v6, but have made it
> a sales process (versus a technical request) and so that complicates things.
>
> -Dave
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:
>
>> New thread: who will route the full IPv6 table? So far I'm seeing PI
>> /48's out of 2620:0:/23 from:
>>
>> NTT, 2914
>> AT&T, 7018
>> Sprint, 1239 and 6175
>> Hurricane, 6939
>> Level 3, 3356
>> Global Crossing, 3549
>> Qwest, 209
>>
>> Did I miss anyone? Qwest only carries one route (out of 4 total) though,
>> don't know if that's an exception or they only have one ARIN PI customer.
>>
>> ~Seth
>>
>>
Qwest still considers this a beta service. They're routing our /32, but
we're still preferring our other peerings.
Not to point fingers, but Force10 is advertising a /64 that HE (and
subsequently Qwest & others) are accepting. I'd suspect they'll accept
most anything.
2620:0:380::/48 x:x:x::x 1537 209 6939 18508 I
2620:0:380:2::/64 x:x:x::x 1537 209 6939 18508
393222 I
--
Chris
