[118148] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ISP customer assignments

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Tue Oct 13 06:26:46 2009

Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:26:08 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <00f701ca4bee$846f8080$8d4e8180$@com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Nathan Ward, please stand up.



Adrian

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009, TJ wrote:
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin
> To go along with Dan's query from above, what are the preferred methods 
> that other SPs are using to deploy IPv6 with non-IPv6-capable edge 
> hardware?  We too have a very limited number of dialup customers and 
> will never sink another dollar in the product.  Unfortunately I also 
> have brand-new ADSL2+ hardware that doesn't support IPv6 and according 
> to the vendors (Pannaway) never will.  We also have CMTSs that don't 
> support IPv6, even though they too are brand-new.  Those CMTSs top out 
> at DOCSIS 2.0 and the vendor decided not to allow IPv6 to the CPEs 
> regardless of the underlying CM's IPv6 support or lack thereof (like 
> Cisco allowed for example).  Are providers implementing tunneling 
> solutions?  Pros/cons of the various solutions?
> 
> 
> > My first (potentially ignorant) response would be to get your acquisitions
> 
> > people aligned with your business, and by that I mean they should be
> making
> > a concerted effort to only buy IPv6 capable gear, especially when IPv6 is
> 
> > coming to you within that gears lifecycle.
> > I guess your customers will need to tunnel, as long as you give them a
> public
> > IP they have 6to4 (and possibly Teredo, tunnel broker) - but native is
> better.
> 
> 

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $24/pm+GST entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post