[118145] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Tue Oct 13 03:45:17 2009
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AD40608.1020004@kl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:44:17 +1300
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 13/10/2009, at 5:46 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> I think he was pointing out that extra routes due to "slow start"
> policies should not be a factor in v6. My guess is that is about
> half of the "extra" routes announced today, the other half being
> TE routes.
You can pretty easily figure out how many advertised prefixes are
intentional de-aggregates, and you can get a fairly good idea as to
how many of them are for TE as well I expect, by looking for different
AS paths.
Someone mentioned some slides earlier in this thread by Vince Fuller
at APRICOT early '07 that from memory have pretty good data on this.
--
Nathan Ward
