[118105] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Mon Oct 12 17:28:41 2009
In-Reply-To: <4AD39CBE.8090709@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:27:49 -0700
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: Dave Temkin <davet1@gmail.com>, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh@marcoh.net>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Funny enough, we've been looking at moving from 174 to HE for a large
amount of traffic, and this discussion is making the decision *a lot*
easier.
On 10/12/09, Dave Temkin <davet1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>>> Cogent: You are absolutely insane. You are doing nothing but
>>> alienating your customers and doing a disservice to IPv6 and the
>>> internet as a whole.
>>>
>>> You are publishing AAAA records for www.cogentco.com, which means
>>> that I CANNOT reach it to even look at your looking glass. I send my
>>> prefixes to 4436, 22822, and 6939 and you are not peering with any of
>>> them. Why not peer, for FREE, with 6939? What could you possibly
>>> gain from NOT doing this? HE is NOT going to buy transit from you
>>> (nor am I). Please fix your policy.
>>
>>
>> May I suggest to vote with your feet and take your business somewhere
>> else. They obviously are not interested in you, your traffic or your
>> money.
>>
>> MarcoH
>>
> Already done. All they are doing is continuing to provide fodder for
> engineers to tell their bosses why to NOT consider 174 transit when it's
> brought up.
>
> -Dave
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
