[118048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Palmer)
Sat Oct 10 06:32:57 2009
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:31:59 +1100
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <c2af1d7d0910090422i6a1cdb17q305406457ee0ecd7@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:22:01PM +0100, Matthew Walster wrote:
> A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
> he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
> declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
>
> If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review
> it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8 and 83/8
> work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.
A pingable address in the problem range would help people to quickly
evaluate whether they have a problem in their network or upstreams...
- Matt
