[118010] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 109/8 - not a BOGON
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Stuppi (jstuppi))
Fri Oct 9 07:44:54 2009
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 07:42:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <c2af1d7d0910090422i6a1cdb17q305406457ee0ecd7@mail.gmail.com>
From: "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstuppi@cisco.com>
To: "Matthew Walster" <matthew@walster.org>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
The 109/8 range was removed from our ISP Ingress Prefix Filters in
version 22 (dated 6-Feb-2009):=20
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/security/Ingress-Prefix-Filter-Template
s/T-ip-prefix-filter-ingress-loose-check-v22.txt
Thanks,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Walster [mailto:matthew@walster.org]=20
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 7:22 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: 109/8 - not a BOGON
Hi there,
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of
addresses he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This
was declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January
2009.
If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you
review it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in
89/8 and 83/8 work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.
Matthew Walster
