[117963] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Loch)
Wed Oct 7 11:40:22 2009
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:39:04 -0400
From: Kevin Loch <kloch@kl.net>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <480A7B9A-F4B5-4CFF-A9EE-4C8874A10993@virtualized.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
David Conrad wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
>> My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as
>> opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
>
> Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they
> indicated they'd do prior to IANA allocating the /12s, you are indeed
> wrong. I'd be happy to hear things have changed.
Only APNIC is doing "bisection" style assignments today:
20091001|apnic|AU|ipv6|2402:c00::|32|allocated
20091001|apnic|SG|ipv6|2402:400::|32|allocated
20091005|apnic|JP|ipv6|2402:1400::|32|allocated
20091006|apnic|NZ|ipv6|2402:1c00::|32|allocated
20090930|arin|US|ipv6|2607:fd70::|32|allocated
20090930|arin|CA|ipv6|2607:fd78::|32|allocated
20091001|arin|US|ipv6|2607:fd80::|32|allocated
20091006|arin|US|ipv6|2607:fd88::|32|allocated
20091005|ripencc|RU|ipv6|2a00:1440::|32|allocated
20091005|ripencc|SI|ipv6|2a00:1448::|32|allocated
20091005|ripencc|IE|ipv6|2a00:1450::|32|allocated
20091005|ripencc|BE|ipv6|2a00:1458::|32|allocated
20090709|lacnic|PY|ipv6|2800:3a0::|32|allocated
20090714|lacnic|CL|ipv6|2800:3b0::|32|allocated
20090807|lacnic|GY|ipv6|2800:3c0::|32|allocated
20090903|lacnic|AR|ipv6|2800:3d0::|32|allocated
20090708|afrinic|GH|ipv6|2001:43c0::|32|allocated
20090729|afrinic|EG|ipv6|2001:43c8::|32|allocated
20090813|afrinic|KE|ipv6|2001:43d0::|32|allocated
20090909|afrinic|ZA|ipv6|2001:43d8::|32|allocated
- Kevin
