[117941] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Tue Oct 6 21:18:16 2009
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <02F303E3-1F6F-40B0-B055-18DA36D9EC3E@daork.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:17:23 -0700
To: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
> My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as
> opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they
indicated they'd do prior to IANA allocating the /12s, you are indeed
wrong. I'd be happy to hear things have changed.
Regards,
-drc
