[117742] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dearborn: Calling all CAcert and/or Thawte Notaries
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Sep 29 18:47:34 2009
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:30:36 PDT."
<4F7EBD6A-477A-4DCA-817E-9D8EEE5F1BDA@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:46:52 -0400
Cc: Nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1254264412_3873P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:30:36 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
> It occurs to me that in addition to the PGP key signings that tend to
> happen at NANOG
> meetings it might be worth having a group notary event for CAcert and/
> or Thawte
> notarizations.
Umm.. aren't the Thawte web-of-trust going belly-up in a few months?
https://search.thawte.com/support/ssl-digital-certificates/index?page=content&id=SO12658
But yes, CAcert may be a good idea.
--==_Exmh_1254264412_3873P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFKwo5ccC3lWbTT17ARAgiXAKCJLjSqpV73IKFnCYbAmodoIZDO2gCgqUOZ
zCkoJUcA8vugvgyjzirYPoY=
=2An6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1254264412_3873P--
