[117432] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fouant, Stefan)
Sat Sep 12 10:51:06 2009
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:48:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <B9326D21-A2EF-43A7-94D4-C1AAC79AEC6D@gmail.com>
From: "Fouant, Stefan" <Stefan.Fouant@neustar.biz>
To: "Cord MacLeod" <cordmacleod@gmail.com>,
"North American Network Operators Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cord MacLeod [mailto:cordmacleod@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:50 PM
> To: North American Network Operators Group
> Subject: Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
>=20
> I'd also add that ISIS supports IPv6 through the addition of TLVs
> whereas OSPF was redesigned into OSPFv3.
>=20
> Personally I like ISIS due to it's simplicity and use it for router
> loopback advertisement only.
Cord, so you've piqued my interest. Are you saying you run ISIS for
loopback recursion, but another protocol for everything else?
--=20
Stefan Fouant
