[117368] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: WS-X6148A-GE-TX performance question

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Thu Sep 10 18:52:03 2009

X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:51:03 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Scott Spencer <scott@dwc-computer.com>
In-Reply-To: <A47E5001BE1A4943B99F123F23EACDD8@HPWORKSTATION>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 10/09/2009 22:17, Scott Spencer wrote:
> I can't really find anything much on X6148A internal architecture online,
> but it would seem that each port gets its own 1gb/s link to the
> card/backplane, and that the bottleneck then is the 32gb/s backplane (which
> is fine, as long as it's not 1 gb/s per each set of 8 ports!).

Sadly, it is 1Gb per each set of 8 ports.  The WS-X6148-GE-TX line card 
has its uses, just not in the data center.  To recap on the thread a 
couple of weeks ago:

- no storm control
- no port security
- 1G aggregate traffic for each group of 8 ports (i.e. think of it as 6 
x gigabit ethernet hubs with shared input buffers connected into a 32G 
backplane)
- 2 ports per etherchannel

It's not a service provider blade and doesn't belong in a data center 
switch setup.  Don't be disappointed by this: it was designed to be an 
aggregation blade for enterprise desktop usage and is quite useful in 
that context.

Nick


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post