[117022] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Fri Aug 28 23:09:29 2009
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'David Barak'" <thegameiam@yahoo.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <702651.75388.qm@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:08:43 -0500
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That deadline is for video.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: David Barak [mailto:thegameiam@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 8:25 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
----- Original Message ----
From: James Downs <egon@egon.cc>
Except this is exactly what happened. The players with vested interests
were allowed a sort of "first refusal" on projects. In areas where they had
lots of customers, they passed on the projects. So, we find that in urban
areas, you can't get fiber in the home, but there are countless rural farms
and homes that have fiber just lying around. I have an acquaintance 60
miles from the closest commercial airport in TN, telling me about the fiber
internet he has.
As an example of the above, Verizon has until 2017 to get FIOS to all of the
neighborhoods of Washington DC
(http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2008/11/24/daily8.html). I
am envious of many of my suburban-dwelling coworkers and friends who already
have it.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
