[117010] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dorn Hetzel)
Fri Aug 28 16:18:14 2009
In-Reply-To: <3c3e3fca0908281059s45e7e746iecfc2542b2ba885e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:17:48 -0400
From: Dorn Hetzel <dhetzel@gmail.com>
To: William Herrin <herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Maybe an NID with an integrated phone and a hand-crank-generator so you can
always crank it to make a call :)
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:59 PM, William Herrin
<herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jack Bates<jbates@brightok.net> wrote:
> > I've yet to hear an ILEC suggest that they not
> > have batteries in the NID to support the voice in power outages.
>
> The battery in my FTTH NID is completely useless. It maintains the
> voice side of the NID but drops the Internet side. Only, I cancelled
> the POTS service years ago and use a Vonage phone. So now I need a
> second UPS for the already-battery-backed NID or I lose phone service.
> Brilliant design that.
>
> IIRC, when my FTTH was installed, I was told: here's the battery. It's
> now your problem. When this light goes red, call the number here to
> BUY a new one.
>
> Folks handle batteries for their flashlights and emergency radios and
> cars and cordless phones. I fail to understand why asking the customer
> to handle one more battery would stymie them.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
> --
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>
>
