[116982] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Fri Aug 28 10:21:24 2009

Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:19:50 -0500
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
In-Reply-To: <200908281405.n7SE5dJa062396@aurora.sol.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Joe Greco wrote:
> We've *already* subsidized the telcos $200 billion for a next generation
> broadband-capable plant, that was supposed to be LEC-neutral...

Yeah, not every telco participated, though the RBOCs sure did.

> So, we've *already* paid the plant cost, and we've gotten nothing much in
> return.

Looking at just Oklahoma, I'm not sure AT&T could get even 200kb to 
every household for $200b.

More interesting, I'd be curious to see how well NSP's could handle the 
increase in traffic if every house support 45mb of Internet (not local 
video/voice). I'd love to see some good data on how the average 
throughput changes as the rates go up, especially with the continued 
increase of higher bandwidth video.

Jack


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post